LotusGuild/cinny
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 27 Pull Requests 5 Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix(settings): measured CPU and download figures for the noise-suppression models #481

Merged
jared merged 1 commits from fix/denoise-cpu-labels into lotus 2026-10-29 21:57:15 -04:00
Conversation 0 Commits 1 Files Changed 2
+10 -7
1 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Lotus CIandClaude Opus 5.5 1ebc42863e fix(settings): measured CPU and download figures for the noise-suppression models
CI / Build & Quality Checks (push) Skipped
CI / Secret scan (gitleaks) (push) Skipped
CI / Playwright smoke (e2e) (push) Skipped
CI / Build & Quality Checks (pull_request) Successful in 1m40s
Details
CI / Trigger Desktop Build (pull_request) Skipped
Details
CI / Docker image build & smoke test (pull_request) Skipped
Details
CI / Secret scan (gitleaks) (pull_request) Successful in 6s
Details
CI / Playwright smoke (e2e) (pull_request) Successful in 19m45s
Details 
The CPU column was guessed (DeepFilterNet "25-50%", DTLN "10-20%") with no
unit, so it read like Task Manager's whole-CPU figure and looked wildly off.
Measured with each model running exactly as Lotus Call runs it (real-time
speech, browser process CPU time from /proc minus a no-model baseline,
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE): DeepFilterNet ~30%, DTLN ~9%, RNNoise ~3%, Speex ~2%
of one core. Label it "one core" and explain the Task Manager relation.
DTLN's download was listed as ~4 MB but fetches ~20 MB (17 MB worklet with
the runtime inlined, plus 4 MB of models); DFN's ~18 MB is right (17.6 MB).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017PCb59uY3UKqDqt7B6hzd5
 2026-10-29 21:35:20 -04:00