Jared Vititoe 1848b71c2a Optimize OSD analyzer: prioritize failing drives and improve SMART collection ...

Major improvements to scoring and data collection:

**Scoring Changes:**
- Failed SMART reads now return 0/100 health (was 50/100)
- Critical health issues get much higher penalties:
  * Reallocated sectors: -50 pts, 5x multiplier (was -20, 2x)
  * Pending sectors: -60 pts, 10x multiplier (was -25, 5x)
  * Uncorrectable sectors: -70 pts, 15x multiplier (was -30, 5x)
  * NVMe media errors: -60 pts, 10x multiplier (was -25, 5x)
- Revised weights: 80% health, 15% capacity, 5% resilience (was 60/30/10)
- Added priority bonuses:
  * Failed SMART + small drive (<5TB): +30 points
  * Failed SMART alone: +20 points
  * Health issues + small drive: +15 points

**Priority Order Now Enforced:**
1. Failed SMART drives (score 90-100)
2. Small drives beginning to fail (70-85)
3. Small healthy drives (40-60)
4. Large failing drives (60-75)

**Enhanced SMART Collection:**
- Added metadata.devices field parsing
- Enhanced dm-device and /dev/mapper/ resolution
- Added ceph-volume lvm list fallback
- Retry logic with 3 command variations per device
- Try with/without sudo, different device flags

**Expected Impact:**
- osd.28 with reallocated sectors jumps from #14 to top 3
- SMART collection failures should drop from 6 to 0-2
- All failing drives rank above healthy drives regardless of size

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-01-06 15:05:25 -05:00

24 KiB

Raw Blame History

View Raw