jaredandClaude Opus 5.5
ce12dede5f
Lint / JS (eslint) (push) Successful in 12s
Lint / Python (flake8) (push) Successful in 1m10s
Lint / Notify on failure (push) Skipped
Lint / Deploy (push) Skipped
Security / Python Security (bandit) (push) Successful in 1m11s
Test / Python Tests (pytest) (push) Successful in 1m42s
Lint / Python (flake8) (pull_request) Successful in 2m28s
Lint / JS (eslint) (pull_request) Successful in 14s
Lint / Notify on failure (pull_request) Skipped
Lint / Deploy (pull_request) Skipped
Security / Python Security (bandit) (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
Test / Python Tests (pytest) (pull_request) Successful in 1m16s
Both laid out from the CC0 NetBox devicetype-library images, with jack centres measured from them: the 24 has one row of 24 RJ45 in groups of 8 (17-24 at 2.5G) and 2 SFP+; the 48 has two rows, odd ports on top, in groups of 16 (33-48 at 2.5G) and 4 SFP+ (49-52). The "2.5G" and "10G" bars under the faster ports are drawn too (fpSpeedBar). Registered as USPM24P/USPM48P with USPM24/USPM48 aliases, and as Front drawing options so the new switch draws on the rack before it is adopted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>