[verify] Thread read receipts must honour "Private Read Receipts" #141
Closed
opened 2026-09-17 16:26:17 -04:00 by jared
·
1 comment
No Branch/Tag Specified
lotus
update-packages
sw-fix
read-me-update
image-path-changes
dm-calls
fix-2469
renovate/element-hq-element-call-embedded-0.x
renovate/npm-i18next-http-backend-vulnerability
renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability
dev
docs-update
more-theme
fix-257
imporve-thread-reply
revert-2402-improve-menu-congestion
mxidColor-toggle
update-sw-main-msg
v4.11.1
v4.10.5
v4.10.4
v4.10.3
v4.10.2
v4.10.1
v4.10.0
v4.9.1
v4.9.0
v4.8.1
v4.8.0
v4.7.1
v4.7.0
v4.6.0
v4.5.1
v4.5.0
v4.4.0
v4.3.2
v4.3.0
v4.2.3
v4.2.2
v4.2.1
v4.2.0
v4.1.0
v4.0.3
v4.0.0
v3.2.0
v3.1.0
v3.0.0
v2.2.6
v2.2.5
v2.2.4
v2.2.3
v2.2.2
v2.2.1
v2.2.0
v2.1.3
v2.1.2
v2.1.1
v2.1.0
v2.0.4
v2.0.3
v2.0.2
v2.0.1
v2.0.0
v1.8.2
v1.8.1
v1.8.0
v1.7.0
v1.6.1
v1.6.0
v1.5.1
v1.5.0
v1.4.0
v1.3.2
v1.3.1
v1.3.0
v1.2.1
v1.2.0
v1.1.0
v1.0.0
Labels
Clear labels
a11y
area: appearance
area: auth-session
area: build-ci
area: calls
area: desktop
area: media
area: messaging
area: mobile
area: moderation
area: navigation
area: notifications
area: settings
area: threads
bug
dependencies
docs
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
needs-human-review
performance
planning
priority: critical
priority: high
priority: low
priority: medium
qa
question
research
security
tech-debt
ux
wontfix
Accessibility: keyboard, screen reader, contrast, motion
Client area: appearance
Client area: auth-session
Client area: build-ci
Client area: calls
Client area: desktop
Client area: media
Client area: messaging
Client area: mobile
Client area: moderation
Client area: navigation
Client area: notifications
Client area: settings
Client area: threads
Something is not working
Third-party package versions and advisories
README / LOTUS_* docs wrong or missing
This issue or pull request already exists
New feature
Need some help
Something is wrong
Re-render storms, leaks, heavy work on hot paths
Data loss, security hole, or crash on a main path
Broken feature or serious usability problem
Minor issue or polish
Wrong behaviour in an edge case or notable degradation
Manual QA: shipped, needs a human in a real environment
More information is needed
XSS, unsafe URLs, data leaks, auth/session
Code health, dead code, fragile patterns
Usability or visual inconsistency
This won't be fixed
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Features 2026-Q4
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: LotusGuild/cinny#141
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Per-thread read tracking (P3-8,
m.readwiththread_id) landed after the private-receipts toggle. Verify the thread receipt path sendsm.read.privatewhenprivateReadReceiptsis on (same for the fully-read marker); if it sends publicm.read, that is a privacy leak. Unit-test the receipt-type selection.Verified on the local dev homeserver with Playwright (
scripts/dev-homeserver.sh), capturing every request to/typing/and/receipt/while typing in the main composer and in the thread composer (thread opened from the root's "2 replies" chip), then receiving a new thread reply while the panel was open. Settings toggled through the real Settings UI, persisted across a reload.m.read×4 (allthread_idscoped)m.read.private×4 (allthread_idscoped)Thread receipts go through
markThreadAsRead(mx, thread, hideActivity || privateReadReceipts)(ThreadPanel.tsx:162) and arem.read.privatewhen either setting is on. Verified — closing.Side observation (not a privacy issue, noted on #165): every thread receipt is sent twice for the same event (4 requests for 2 events in both runs) —
markReadis invoked on bothThreadEvent.NewReplyandRoomEvent.Timeline, or the panel effect runs for two thread instances. Harmless, but worth a dedupe in the threads audit.