chore(issues): point the issue chooser at this repo, not upstream Cinny
CI / Build & Quality Checks (push) Successful in 10m54s
CI / Trigger Desktop Build (push) Successful in 5s

The forked-in Cinny issue setup funneled reporters to the upstream project:
- config.yml disabled blank issues and linked to cinnyapp/cinny GitHub
  Discussions
- preapproved.md was Cinny's "do not open an issue, use Discussions"
  template (Gitea has no Discussions anyway)

Replace it with a Lotus setup: enable blank issues, drop the upstream
contact link, and add Bug Report + Feature Request templates. Now
/issues/new/choose offers Lotus templates and files against this repo.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-02 20:48:59 -04:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 4.8
parent f2c356f288
commit d5cfb663b9
4 changed files with 43 additions and 14 deletions
+15
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
---
name: Feature Request
about: Suggest an idea or improvement for Lotus Chat
title: ''
labels: enhancement
---
**What would you like?**
A clear and concise description of the feature or change.
**Why / use case**
What problem does it solve, or what does it make better?
**Alternatives considered**
Any workarounds or other approaches you've thought about.